谷红注射液治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究
作者:
作者单位:

1.中南大学湘雅医院,湖南 长沙 410008;2.武汉市第五医院,湖北 武汉 430050;3.西安市中心医院,陕西 西安 710003;4.洛阳市第三人民医院,河南 洛阳 471002;5.淮安市中医院,江苏 淮安 223001

作者简介:

夏健(1973―),女,博士,教授,主要从事脑血管疾病的基础与临床研究。Email:jianxia08@yahoo.com。

通信作者:

肖波(1962―),男,主任医师,教授,博士生导师,中南大学神经病学国家重点学科负责人,国家临床重点建设专科负责人,主要从事癫痫的基础和临床研究。Email:xiaobo_xy@126.com。

基金项目:

吉林省科技厅医药健康产业发展专项资金项目(20190003);吉林省科技厅医药健康产业发展专项资金项目(20200407007MH)。


Clinical efficacy and safety of guhong injection in treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Xiangya Hospital of Centre South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, China;2.Wuhan Fifth Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430050, China;3.Xi'an Central Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710003, China;4.Luoyang Third People's Hospital, Luoyang, Heinan 471002, China;5.Huaian Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Huaian, Jiangsu 223001, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的 观察谷红注射液治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法 该研究为一项多中心、前瞻性研究,采用随机、双盲、平行对照的临床试验设计方法。纳入2021年7月22日至2024年4月30日就诊于31家医院的急性缺血性脑卒中患者2 000例。经筛选随机分组后,试验组纳入999例,对照组纳入1 000例。试验组给予谷红注射液,对照组给予安慰剂(生理盐水),2组疗程均为10 d。比较2组患者发病90 d后的改良Rankin量表(mRS)相对于基线期的变化情况,评估经治疗后mRS评分≤2分的患者比例。观察并记录2组患者治疗期间出现的不良反应情况。结果 发病90 d后,试验组mRS评分≤2分的患者比例[71.10%,710/999]高于对照组 [65.10%,651/1 000],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在整个试验期间,试验组不良反应的发生率为0.70%,对照组不良反应的发生率为0.40%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。综合不良反应、临床实验室检查、心电图和生命体征等安全性评价指标结果,试验组与对照组安全性相当。结论 谷红注射液具有疗效确切、安全可靠的优点,且能够提高临床顺应性,可有效改善急性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床症状,提高生活质量,值得临床推广使用。国际神经病学神经外科学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 1-7]

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of guhong injection in the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke.Methods A multicenter prospective study was conducted with a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial design. A total of 2 000 patients with acute ischemic stroke who attended 31 hospitals from July 22, 2021 to April 30, 2024 were enrolled, and after screening and randomization, 999 patients were enrolled in the experimental group and 1 000 were enrolled in the control group. The patients in the experimental group were given Guhong injection, while those in the control group were given placebo (normal saline), and the course of treatment was 10 days for both groups. The two groups were compared in terms of the change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score on day 90 after disease onset, as well as the proportion of subjects with an mRS score of ≤2 after treatment, and the adverse reactions during treatment were observed and recorded for both groups.Results On day 90 after disease onset, the experimental group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with an mRS score of ≤2 than the control group [71.10% (710/999) vs 65.10% (651/1 000), P<0.05]. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse reactions between the experimental group and the control group during treatment (0.70% vs 0.40%, P>0.05). The experimental group showed comparable safety to the control group based on a comprehensive safety assessment of adverse reactions, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiographic findings, and vital signs.Conclusions Guhong injection has the advantages of marked clinical efficacy and good safety and reliability and can effectively improve clinical compliance and the clinical symptoms and quality of life of patients with acute ischemic stroke, and therefore, it holds promise for clinical application. [Journal of International Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2024, 51(4): 1-7]

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

夏健,殷俊,熊涛,狄政莉,孙冰,王兵,胡仁琳,龙泓宇,黄清,肖波456.谷红注射液治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床研究[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2024,51(4):1-7111XIA Jian, YIN Jun, XIONG Tao, DI Zhengli, SUN Bing, WANG Bing, HU Renlin, LONG Hongyu, HUANG Qing, XIAO Bo222. Clinical efficacy and safety of guhong injection in treatment of acute ischemic stroke: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial[J]. Journal of International Neurology and Neurosurgery,2024,51(4):1-7

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-18
  • 最后修改日期:2024-08-07
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-09-27
关闭
关于有作者收到“抽查数据”邮件的再次申明

关闭