大骨瓣减压对重型颅脑创伤治疗作用的临床研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通信作者:

基金项目:


Clinical research for decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 音频文件
  • |
  • 视频文件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨大骨瓣减压术(DC)对重度颅脑损伤(STBI)的治疗价值。方法 纳入132例STBI患者,分两组采用大骨瓣减压术或常规骨瓣开颅,每组各66人。随访6个月,首要结局评价指标为临床疗效,次要结局评价指标为术后并发症的发生。结果 6个月时,大骨瓣减压术组死亡10例(15.2%)、长期昏迷2例(3.0%)、重等残疾13例(19.7%)、中等残疾6例(9.1%)、良好35例(53.0%);常规骨瓣开颅组分别为14例(21.2%)、4例(6.1%)、20例(30.3%)、18例(27.3%)、10例(15.2%)。大骨瓣减压术组疗效好于常规骨瓣开颅组(χ2=37.998,P=0.000)。6个月内,大骨瓣减压术组发生急性脑膨出7例(10.6%)、迟发性血肿5例(7.6%)、外伤癫痫6例(9.1%)、颅内感染3例(4.5%)、切口脑脊液漏3例(4.5%),总共并发症24例(36.4%);常规骨瓣开颅组分别为20例(30.3%)、5例(7.6%)、7例(10.6%)、2例(3.0%)、2例(3.0%)和36例(54.5%)。大骨瓣减压术组术后并发症少于常规骨瓣开颅组(χ2=4.400,P=0.036)。经多因素调整后,大骨瓣减压术疗效良好的机会是常规骨瓣开颅的2.173倍(P=0.011)。结论 大骨瓣减压术对重度颅脑损伤的治疗效果优于常规骨瓣开颅,预后好、并发症少。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the therapeutic value for decompressive craniectomy (DC) in severe traumatic brain injury (STBI).Methods A total of 132 STBI patients were included in this study, which were divided into DC group and conventional craniotomy group, 66 in each group. After 6 months follow up, clinical efficacy was evaluated as the primary outcome, postoperative complications was evaluated as the secondary outcome.Results After 6 months followed up, 10 patients died (15.2%) in the DC group, 2 patients with prolonged coma (3.0%), 13 patients with severe disabilities (19.7%), 6 patients with moderate disability(9.1%), 35 patients were good (53.0%), respectively. While in the conventional craniotomy group, it was 14 patients (21.2%), 4 patients (6.1%), 20 patients (30.3%), 18 patients (27.3%), and 10 patients (15.2%) respectively. The therapeutic value were more effective in the DC group than that in the conventional group (χ2 =37.998, P=0.000). Within 6 months follow up, complications with 7 case(10.6%) of acute brain swelling in the DC group, 5 cases (7.6%) of delayed hematoma, 6 cases (9.1%) of trauma epilepsy, 3 cases(4.5%) of intracranial infection, and 3 cases (4.5%) of leakage cerebrospinal fluid, respectively. The complications in the conventional group were 30.3%, 7.6%, 10.6 %, 3.0%, 3.0%. The DC group has a few complications than that in the conventional group (χ2=4.400, P=0.036). After multivariate adjustment, the effect of decompressive craniectomy has a better opportunity than conventional craniotomy, the OR was 2.173 (P=0.011).Conclusions In the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury, decompressive craniectomy is superior to conventional craniotomy, better prognosis, with less complication.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

桂成佳, 胡丹456.大骨瓣减压对重型颅脑创伤治疗作用的临床研究[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2012,39(2):155-157111GUI Chen-Jia, HU-Dan222. Clinical research for decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Journal of International Neurology and Neurosurgery,2012,39(2):155-157

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-17
  • 最后修改日期:2012-04-06
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2012-04-28
关闭
关闭